The Geography of Discovery

Where the world's prize-winning science was done, decade by decade.

Data as of

661 of 668 Nobel science prizes placed at the city where the work was done · Nobel Prize API, Wikidata

Where the prizes were won

Each cell is a metro's share of the Nobel Physics, Chemistry and Medicine prize weight in a decade. Darker is bigger.

How the shares are built
Weight is the prize's tier weight divided among that year's winners, credited to the metro where each winner worked when the prize was awarded. Eight metros are shown, the leaders over the whole period.

Paris and Berlin led the first four decades, with Copenhagen sharing the 1920s. From the 1940s an American metro led or co-led every decade: New York and Boston first, then Los Angeles in the 1990s. The San Francisco Bay Area has led or shared the lead in every decade since 2000.

Share of each decade’s Nobel science prize weight, by metro where the work was done, in whole percent.
Metro1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
New York050920 (leader)18 (leader)512 (leader)8129 (leader)9 (leader)11
SF Bay Area000451312511 (leader)109 (leader)9 (leader)14 (leader)
Boston05035614 (leader)1111 (leader)14936
Paris17 (leader)911 (leader)4007018534
London9274627920223
Los Angeles00460490417 (leader)352
Berlin1514 (leader)711 (leader)500010304
Cambridge (UK)4074077661270
0%20%Leader of the decade (all tied metros outlined)The 2020s cover 2020 to 2026 only.

Leaders that are not one of these eight rows: Copenhagen (1920s). Cambridge here is Cambridge, UK; Harvard and MIT are counted under Boston.

The capital of science, by decade

The metro with the most Nobel science prize weight in each decade, and the one behind it.

How this is measured
Where two or more metros tie on weight they are all shown as co-leaders. Share is of the decade's total weight at metros with a worked-at record.
DecadeLeaderShareRunner-up
1900sParis16.7%Berlin14.8%
1910sBerlin13.6%Paris9.1%
1920sCopenhagen and Paris(tied)11.1% eachGöttingen9.3%
1930sBerlin11.1%New York9.3%
1940sNew York19.8%Oxford and St. Louis7.9%
1950sNew York17.8%San Francisco-San Jose12.8%
1960sBoston13.9%San Francisco-San Jose11.7%
1970sNew York11.8%Boston11.2%
1980sBoston and San Francisco-San Jose(tied)11.2% eachNew York8.4%
1990sLos Angeles16.7%Boston13.8%
2000sSan Francisco-San Jose and New York(tied)9.1% eachBoston8.6%
2010sSan Francisco-San Jose and New York(tied)9.0% eachTokyo and Cambridge7.3%
2020s*San Francisco-San Jose14.3%New York11.1%

* The 2020s cover 2020 to 2026 only.

2026

The 2026 Nobel science winners, from the place each was born to the place the work was done.

Wider prizes, 2026: Gerd Faltings (Abel Prize, Lüdenscheid); Frank Merle (Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics, Paris); Hong Wang (Fields Medal, Bures-sur-Yvette); Jacob Tsimerman (Fields Medal, Toronto); John Pardon (Fields Medal, Stanford); Yu Deng (Fields Medal); Kunihiro Hattori (Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award, Tokyo); Takehisa Kitazawa (Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award); Michael Woodford (Nobel Economic Sciences, New York, NY); Robert E. Hall (Nobel Economic Sciences, Stanford, CA).

Born here, won there

Counts of laureates in the wider prize set whose birth metro and worked-at metro differ. Each person counts once.

Importers

Metros where the most laureates worked who were born elsewhere.

#MetroLaureates drawn inBorn here
1Boston13130
2San Francisco-San Jose12119
3New York119133
4Los Angeles5016
5Chicago4541
6Cambridge428
7Washington-Baltimore3627
8London3241
9New Haven288
10Paris2737
11Oxford243
12Berlin1818

Exporters

Metros where the most laureates were born who won elsewhere.

#MetroLaureates sent outBorn here
1New York114133
2Chicago3741
3London3441
4Washington-Baltimore2427
5Boston2230
6Paris1937
7Berlin1818
8Philadelphia1719
9Vienna1719
10Moscow1619
11Budapest1515
12Los Angeles1516

From India to the world

15 science laureates born in India, by year, with where each did the work.

Who is counted
Born in present-day India, plus anyone born before 1947 in territory that is now Pakistan or Bangladesh, who is marked. The set is the wider science prize list, not the Nobel alone. A blank work place means no affiliation is on record.
LaureatePrizeYearBornWorked
Ronald RossNobel Physiology or Medicine1902Almora, IndiaLiverpool, United Kingdom
Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata RamanNobel Physics1930Tiruchirappalli, IndiaCalcutta, India
Rustom Jal VakilLasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award1957Mumbai, Indianot recorded
H. Gobind KhoranaNobel Physiology or Medicine1968Raipur, IndiaMadison, WI, USA
Abdus SalamNobel Physics1979Jhang Maghiāna, Pakistanborn in British IndiaTrieste, Italy
Subrahmanyan ChandrasekharNobel Physics1983Lahore, Pakistanborn in British IndiaChicago, IL, USA
Amartya SenNobel Economic Sciences1998Santiniketan, IndiaCambridge, United Kingdom
Ravinder N. MainiCrafoord Prize2000Ludhiana, IndiaSouth Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Ravinder N. MainiLasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award2003Ludhiana, IndiaSouth Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Sathamangalam Ranga Iyengar Srinivasa VaradhanAbel Prize2007Chennai, IndiaNew York City, United States
Venkatraman RamakrishnanNobel Chemistry2009Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, IndiaCambridge, United Kingdom
Ashoke SenBreakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics2012Kolkata, Indianot recorded
Akshay VenkateshFields Medal2018Delhi, IndiaStanford, United States
Abhijit BanerjeeNobel Economic Sciences2019Mumbai, IndiaCambridge, MA, USA
Shankar BalasubramanianBreakthrough Prize in Life Sciences2022Chennai, Indianot recorded

Places are named as they are today.

Two measures of the shift

How often the work crossed a border, and how concentrated it was in a few cities.

Crossed a border, 1930s and 2020s

23.7% → 35.3%

Share of Nobel science winners who worked in a different country from the one they were born in: 9 of 38 in the 1930s (the lowest decade), 18 of 51 in the 2020s.

Top five metros, 1900s and 2020s

51.9% → 41.3%

Share of each decade’s prize weight held by its five leading metros. The peak was the 1990s, at 59.8%.

Distinct metros, 1900s and 2020s

21 → 31

Metros with at least one Nobel science prize row at a worked-at place. The 2020s are an incomplete decade, so its count is a floor.

Where these numbers come from16 Oct 2026

Each prize row is credited to the metro where the laureate worked when the prize was won. A row carries its tier weight (10 for Nobel) divided by the number of winners in that prize-year, the same rule as the Laurels boards, and decade shares use only rows with a worked-at metro. CORE is Nobel Physics, Chemistry and Physiology or Medicine; WIDER adds Nobel Economic Sciences, Fields, Abel, Turing, Wolf, Lasker (not Public Service), Breakthrough, Crafoord and Kyoto (not Arts and Philosophy).

Worked-at rule: a laureate is placed at the metro of their affiliation at the time of the award; where there is more than one affiliation, the first one that resolves to a city is used. Prizes won by an organisation are left out, as are rows with no worked-at metro (7 of 668 Nobel science rows), which is why the shares are of placed weight only.

Weight rule: a Nobel prize carries a tier weight of 10, divided equally among that year’s winners in the same prize, so a three-way share gives each winner a third. Decade leaders are the metros with the highest total weight; where weights tie, all tied metros are shown. Crossing a border means the worked-at country differs from the birth country.

Sources: the Nobel Prize API (nobelprize.org) for the Nobel prizes and Wikidata for birthplaces, affiliations and the other prizes. The 2020s are an incomplete decade. Data as of 2026-10-16.