The Geography of Discovery
Where the world's prize-winning science was done, decade by decade.
Data as of
661 of 668 Nobel science prizes placed at the city where the work was done · Nobel Prize API, Wikidata
Where the prizes were won
Each cell is a metro's share of the Nobel Physics, Chemistry and Medicine prize weight in a decade. Darker is bigger.
How the shares are built
Paris and Berlin led the first four decades, with Copenhagen sharing the 1920s. From the 1940s an American metro led or co-led every decade: New York and Boston first, then Los Angeles in the 1990s. The San Francisco Bay Area has led or shared the lead in every decade since 2000.
| Metro | 1900s | 1910s | 1920s | 1930s | 1940s | 1950s | 1960s | 1970s | 1980s | 1990s | 2000s | 2010s | 2020s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | 0 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 20 (leader) | 18 (leader) | 5 | 12 (leader) | 8 | 12 | 9 (leader) | 9 (leader) | 11 |
| SF Bay Area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 11 (leader) | 10 | 9 (leader) | 9 (leader) | 14 (leader) |
| Boston | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 (leader) | 11 | 11 (leader) | 14 | 9 | 3 | 6 |
| Paris | 17 (leader) | 9 | 11 (leader) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| London | 9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Los Angeles | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 17 (leader) | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Berlin | 15 | 14 (leader) | 7 | 11 (leader) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Cambridge (UK) | 4 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
Leaders that are not one of these eight rows: Copenhagen (1920s). Cambridge here is Cambridge, UK; Harvard and MIT are counted under Boston.
The capital of science, by decade
The metro with the most Nobel science prize weight in each decade, and the one behind it.
How this is measured
| Decade | Leader | Share | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | Paris | 16.7% | Berlin14.8% |
| 1910s | Berlin | 13.6% | Paris9.1% |
| 1920s | Copenhagen and Paris(tied) | 11.1% each | Göttingen9.3% |
| 1930s | Berlin | 11.1% | New York9.3% |
| 1940s | New York | 19.8% | Oxford and St. Louis7.9% |
| 1950s | New York | 17.8% | San Francisco-San Jose12.8% |
| 1960s | Boston | 13.9% | San Francisco-San Jose11.7% |
| 1970s | New York | 11.8% | Boston11.2% |
| 1980s | Boston and San Francisco-San Jose(tied) | 11.2% each | New York8.4% |
| 1990s | Los Angeles | 16.7% | Boston13.8% |
| 2000s | San Francisco-San Jose and New York(tied) | 9.1% each | Boston8.6% |
| 2010s | San Francisco-San Jose and New York(tied) | 9.0% each | Tokyo and Cambridge7.3% |
| 2020s* | San Francisco-San Jose | 14.3% | New York11.1% |
* The 2020s cover 2020 to 2026 only.
2026
The 2026 Nobel science winners, from the place each was born to the place the work was done.
Francis Halzen
Nobel Physics
Born Tienen, Belgium → worked Madison, WI, USA
Georg Nagel
Nobel Physiology or Medicine
Born Weingarten, Germany → worked Würzburg, Germany
Henri B. Kagan
Nobel Chemistry
Born Boulogne-Billancourt, France → worked Orsay, France
Karl Deisseroth
Nobel Physiology or Medicine
Born Boston, MA, USA → worked Stanford, CA, USA
Kenso Soai
Nobel Chemistry
Born Hiroshima, Japan → worked Tokyo, Japan
Peter Hegemann
Nobel Physiology or Medicine
Born Münster, Germany → worked Berlin, Germany
Wider prizes, 2026: Gerd Faltings (Abel Prize, Lüdenscheid); Frank Merle (Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics, Paris); Hong Wang (Fields Medal, Bures-sur-Yvette); Jacob Tsimerman (Fields Medal, Toronto); John Pardon (Fields Medal, Stanford); Yu Deng (Fields Medal); Kunihiro Hattori (Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award, Tokyo); Takehisa Kitazawa (Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award); Michael Woodford (Nobel Economic Sciences, New York, NY); Robert E. Hall (Nobel Economic Sciences, Stanford, CA).
Born here, won there
Counts of laureates in the wider prize set whose birth metro and worked-at metro differ. Each person counts once.
Importers
Metros where the most laureates worked who were born elsewhere.
| # | Metro | Laureates drawn in | Born here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boston | 131 | 30 |
| 2 | San Francisco-San Jose | 121 | 19 |
| 3 | New York | 119 | 133 |
| 4 | Los Angeles | 50 | 16 |
| 5 | Chicago | 45 | 41 |
| 6 | Cambridge | 42 | 8 |
| 7 | Washington-Baltimore | 36 | 27 |
| 8 | London | 32 | 41 |
| 9 | New Haven | 28 | 8 |
| 10 | Paris | 27 | 37 |
| 11 | Oxford | 24 | 3 |
| 12 | Berlin | 18 | 18 |
Exporters
Metros where the most laureates were born who won elsewhere.
| # | Metro | Laureates sent out | Born here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York | 114 | 133 |
| 2 | Chicago | 37 | 41 |
| 3 | London | 34 | 41 |
| 4 | Washington-Baltimore | 24 | 27 |
| 5 | Boston | 22 | 30 |
| 6 | Paris | 19 | 37 |
| 7 | Berlin | 18 | 18 |
| 8 | Philadelphia | 17 | 19 |
| 9 | Vienna | 17 | 19 |
| 10 | Moscow | 16 | 19 |
| 11 | Budapest | 15 | 15 |
| 12 | Los Angeles | 15 | 16 |
From India to the world
15 science laureates born in India, by year, with where each did the work.
Who is counted
| Laureate | Prize | Year | Born | Worked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Ross | Nobel Physiology or Medicine | 1902 | Almora, India | Liverpool, United Kingdom |
| Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman | Nobel Physics | 1930 | Tiruchirappalli, India | Calcutta, India |
| Rustom Jal Vakil | Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award | 1957 | Mumbai, India | not recorded |
| H. Gobind Khorana | Nobel Physiology or Medicine | 1968 | Raipur, India | Madison, WI, USA |
| Abdus Salam | Nobel Physics | 1979 | Jhang Maghiāna, Pakistanborn in British India | Trieste, Italy |
| Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar | Nobel Physics | 1983 | Lahore, Pakistanborn in British India | Chicago, IL, USA |
| Amartya Sen | Nobel Economic Sciences | 1998 | Santiniketan, India | Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| Ravinder N. Maini | Crafoord Prize | 2000 | Ludhiana, India | South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom |
| Ravinder N. Maini | Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award | 2003 | Ludhiana, India | South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom |
| Sathamangalam Ranga Iyengar Srinivasa Varadhan | Abel Prize | 2007 | Chennai, India | New York City, United States |
| Venkatraman Ramakrishnan | Nobel Chemistry | 2009 | Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India | Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| Ashoke Sen | Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics | 2012 | Kolkata, India | not recorded |
| Akshay Venkatesh | Fields Medal | 2018 | Delhi, India | Stanford, United States |
| Abhijit Banerjee | Nobel Economic Sciences | 2019 | Mumbai, India | Cambridge, MA, USA |
| Shankar Balasubramanian | Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences | 2022 | Chennai, India | not recorded |
Places are named as they are today.
Two measures of the shift
How often the work crossed a border, and how concentrated it was in a few cities.
Crossed a border, 1930s and 2020s
23.7% → 35.3%
Share of Nobel science winners who worked in a different country from the one they were born in: 9 of 38 in the 1930s (the lowest decade), 18 of 51 in the 2020s.
Top five metros, 1900s and 2020s
51.9% → 41.3%
Share of each decade’s prize weight held by its five leading metros. The peak was the 1990s, at 59.8%.
Distinct metros, 1900s and 2020s
21 → 31
Metros with at least one Nobel science prize row at a worked-at place. The 2020s are an incomplete decade, so its count is a floor.
Where these numbers come from16 Oct 2026
Each prize row is credited to the metro where the laureate worked when the prize was won. A row carries its tier weight (10 for Nobel) divided by the number of winners in that prize-year, the same rule as the Laurels boards, and decade shares use only rows with a worked-at metro. CORE is Nobel Physics, Chemistry and Physiology or Medicine; WIDER adds Nobel Economic Sciences, Fields, Abel, Turing, Wolf, Lasker (not Public Service), Breakthrough, Crafoord and Kyoto (not Arts and Philosophy).
Worked-at rule: a laureate is placed at the metro of their affiliation at the time of the award; where there is more than one affiliation, the first one that resolves to a city is used. Prizes won by an organisation are left out, as are rows with no worked-at metro (7 of 668 Nobel science rows), which is why the shares are of placed weight only.
Weight rule: a Nobel prize carries a tier weight of 10, divided equally among that year’s winners in the same prize, so a three-way share gives each winner a third. Decade leaders are the metros with the highest total weight; where weights tie, all tied metros are shown. Crossing a border means the worked-at country differs from the birth country.
Sources: the Nobel Prize API (nobelprize.org) for the Nobel prizes and Wikidata for birthplaces, affiliations and the other prizes. The 2020s are an incomplete decade. Data as of 2026-10-16.